Trump’s Troops Capture Venezuelan President Maduro. Does Might Make Right?

Overnight, U.S. troops entered Venezuela and captured President Nicolas Maduro and his wife and flew them out of the country under U.S. custody. They are to stand trial in the United States. This military maneuver came as a surprise to many, both inside and outside of Venezuela. Civilians died, but the number of deaths is still unknown. There is no doubt that this attack reveals U.S. military supremacy, but that is not the major issue. The main question that must be answered is the following: “Does might make right?”. All major ethical systems would answer with a clear “No!”

Let’s be clear. Maduro was a thug. Although he had previously been elected President of his country, it also seems quite evident that he stole the most recent election. His Vice-President Delcy Rodriguez has claimed that she is running the country according to the Venezuelan Constitution. Some of the opposition affirm that it should be Edmundo Gonzalez who really won the election. Others suggest it should be Nobel Peace Prize winner Maria Corina Machado. It remains to be seen who the Venezuelan generals will support. It is likely there will be fighting in the streets with many deaths. My hope and prayer are that the Venezuelan people will determine their own national destiny.

Nevertheless, I raise serious questions for the Trump administration.

  1. According to the U.S. Constitution, Congress must authorize acts of warfare. Trump did not seek nor obtain this authorization. Neither did he even inform the bipartisan “Gang of 8” before the attack. Article 2 of the Constitution is an exception which grants limited war power to the President but only if U.S. personnel are under “actual or imminent” attack. Under no stretch of the imagination was this condition met.
  2. Trump did not appeal to the United Nations for authorization. In fact, the President of Colombia has already asked the UN Security Council to intervene. Will the U.S. (a founding member of the UN) even acknowledge that it violated the UN charter?
  3. Trump gave a campaign promise that he would not take our country into war, especially to bring about “regime change”. Hegseth and Rubio made the same promise to our Congress last month. Trump does not seem to understand the complexities of Venezuela’s internal polarization. Does he have any clue about the “day after”. Did candidate Trump lie to his MAGA base?
  4. Just War Theory affirms that wars should never be waged in order to obtain the natural resources of another country. Venezuela has the world’s largest oil reserves. To what extent has this oil motivated Trump’s military attack?
  5. According to the polls, Trump is the most unpopular president of the last hundred years. Over 60% of Americans disagree with his policies on the economy, health care, ICE detentions, and tariffs. Does he hope our people will rally around a president at war with a “cheap patriotism? A genuine love for one’s country seeks truth, justice, the rule of law and peace that comes from national righteousness.

I ask all people of good will to ask and answer these tough, but necessary questions. “Might makes right” is an immoral heresy that should be rejected.

2 thoughts on “Trump’s Troops Capture Venezuelan President Maduro. Does Might Make Right?

  1. Your five questions were very helpful for me to read. Much appreciated!

    1. I’ve heard George H. W. Bush did the same thing in Panama in the 90s, i.e. he did not get congressional approval before taking military action. This does not make it ok, but it’s worth noting when we have a pattern. Of the five questions you raised, this one is the most disturbing to me. All powers need to be reigned in/balanced, and clearly this one is out of balance which is very concerning not only for the rest of this presidential term but as a precedent enabling further disregard of our three co-equal branches of government.
    2. Regarding the UN (and now NATO as it relates to Greenland), I have to think our current president would be delighted to diminish the powers of both, or to have them cease to exist entirely.
    3. I bet Trump didn’t lie to his base. My best guess is he has no principles but instead makes decisions in the moment that, at that time, seem most advantageous. So, no, he didn’t lie. He just came up with a better idea (and his ideas don’t need the approval of anyone else). I hope MAGA is upset. For them, it would be a lie.
    4. Wasn’t Trump direct and explicit that oil was a major motivator? Perhaps my memory or understanding is bad. Either way, this reality sickens me. His amorality continues and becomes ours.
    5. I am guessing this is his hope. Someone else convinced him intervention would be good for something and he also remembered how his last military action brought him accolade. So, he’s out for more accolade. Thanks for talking about national righteousness. It’s beautiful to hear. Right now I am embarrassed to be American. Sad and horrified to be American. We are abusers to other countries. I long for the morality you refer to.

    I appreciated this line very much: ““Might makes right” is an immoral heresy that should be rejected.”

    Thank you Lindy.

    Like

    1. Hi again, Amanda. You are right in #1. Bush did not get congressional authorization regarding our miitary intervention in Panama. in fact, Republican and Democrat presidents have violated this article of the Constitution. It is a serious violation regardless of which party is guilty.
      #2 Trump has little respect for the UN and NATO unless they benefit him.
      # 5 The phrase “National Righteousness” was made popular by Abraham Lincoln.
      Thanks for your comments.

      Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.