The Transactional Relationship between Musk and Trump has Come to an End

The “special relationship” between President Donald Trump and the richest man in the world, Elon Musk, has come to the end of the line. On Wednesday night, Elon announced that his assignment as a “special government employee” at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) was ending. On Friday that decision became official as the president gave Musk a farewell celebration in the White House. Of course, Trump tried to “spin” the story by claiming Musk’s actions as very successful. Read on for the “rest of the story”.

They had a transactional relationship that had hardly been created “in heaven”. Therefore, when they were no longer useful to each other, it was time to call it quits, although they have done so rather amiably.

As head of DOGE, Musk led the crusade to make huge reductions to federal spending. (I do applaud the attempt to move towards a balanced budget. It is Musk’s methods that I criticize.) He infamously appeared on stage with a chain saw and promised to cut out waste, corruption, and fraud from federal agencies. He originally predicted he would save $2 trillion, but in fact, the savings are closer to $150 billion. Even these “savings” lack documented evidence. Some of his cuts, like the hollowing out of USAID, were unbelievably cruel and caused the premature, unnecessary deaths of tens of thousands of malnourished and sick people all over the world. Other agencies saw the number of their employees decimated with a chain saw with no rhyme nor reason, instead of the needed precision of a scalpel. For example, his cuts included the federal employees who were responsible for overseeing our atomic energy program. These workers had to be rehired within days. Some of his cost-cutting firings have caused more loss in federal income than the dollars that were saved. A prime example is the IRS (Internal Revenue Service) whose personnel numbers were cut in half during the tax season. Not only did this cause significant delays in the processing of tax returns, a reduction in the availability of taxpayer assistance services, and problems with the implementation of recent tax code changes. It will also greatly reduce the number of audits performed on those suspected of trying to cheat the system. The amount underpaid by these cheaters is measured in millions and perhaps billions of dollars, which will now not be collected.

Most of Musk’s indiscriminate cuts are tied up in the courts. The Trump administration is facing a lawsuit for violating federal privacy laws for giving DOGE access to systems that contained personal information on millions of Americans without their consent. The payments for these legal fees will be astronomical. For all of these reasons, Musk’s approval rate in national polls have fallen to about 35-38%, several points below Trump’s. Consumers have also shown their displeasure by boycotting Tesla cars. Sales have fallen significantly this spring not only in the United States, but also in Canada and by a whopping 50% in Europe.

Nevertheless, Musk is rich enough that he didn’t need to hide his opinions. He hated to be a “yes man”. He publicly feuded with members of Trump’s cabinet. He recently pointed out that he disagrees with the Trump agenda on some key issues. For example, he criticized the “big, beautiful budget” bill for increasing the national debt by about $4 trillion which is directly opposite to the goals of DOGE. As this bill has moved to the U.S. Senate, it now depends on the courage (or lack thereof) of Republican senators. Will they increase the debt by giving beautiful tax breaks to the very rich, while at the same time cutting benefits to Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP, and Veterans? Musk is gone, but there still is time to correct some of his mistakes.

Elon’s (Love of) Money Can’t Buy You Love…Nor Many Votes: A Case Study From Wisconsin

On Tuesday, people went to the polls in Florida and Wisconsin. In Florida there were two special elections to choose replacements for Representatives Matt Gaetz and Michael Waltz who had resigned their positions in the House of Representatives to join the Trump cabinet. (In fact, Gaetz’s bad reputation led to his withdrawal as the nominee for Attorney General, whereas Waltz has become Trump’s National Security Adviser.). Both districts (#1 and #6) are predominantly Republican in which Trump won by over 30 percentage points last November. Both Republican candidates won their races, each by a margin of fourteen percentage points. As a result, Republican control of the House of Representatives is slightly improved. On the other hand, these two elections are warning signs for Republicans. A decline in their margins of victory from over 30% to just 14% is a clear indication of buyer’s remorse. Polls conducted this week show President Trump’s approval rate has slipped to 43%, his lowest level since the inauguration. As his widely unpopular tariffs take effect, inflation will increase and a recession is looming on the horizon (as I correctly predicted in an earlier posting on this blog site).

A more dramatic disaster took place in Wisconsin. The principal election in that state was to choose a replacement for a position on Wisconsin’s Supreme Court. Technically, this was a non-partisan race. The party initials (D) and (R) did not appear on the ballot. Nevertheless, party preferences were quite clear. Trump and most Republican state leaders endorsed the conservative candidate, Brad Schimel. Democrats largely supported Susan Crawford, the progressive candidate. Wisconsin is a “purple” state with almost an equal number of registered Republicans and Democrats. Biden won the state in 2020, but Trump won in 2024 by a margin under 1% of the vote. The election was quite important because it would tilt the Supreme Court, especially on the redistricting of the state’s federal districts for the U.S. House of Representatives.

The race was also the most expensive judiciary election in U.S. with a total of over ninety million dollars spent by candidates, and political parties and donors from within and outside the state. The richest person in the world, Elon Musk, took a special interest in the race and donated twenty million dollars from his personal wealth for the Schimel campaign. He proudly offered $100 to any voter who would promise to oppose “activist judges” and he wrote out checks for a million dollars to two lucky winners of an ideological contest. (This money for votes scheme was even more egregious than JFK’s giving away of two-dollar bills back in 1960.) Musk even made a personal visit to Milwaukee over the weekend to campaign for Schimel. His money and visit proved to be toxic. The liberal candidate Susan Crawford won the election by a wide margin (55% to 45%). Even more important than the issues (redistricting, abortion, etc.), the election turned into a referendum on Musk and his money involved in politics. In her victory speech, Crawford claimed that she ran against the wealthiest man on earth…, and she won.

I Applaud Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski for Her Courage in Denouncing Elon Musk’s Cruel Firings

Lisa Murkowski is a Republican. She has represented her home state of Alaska in the United States Senate since 2002. She is on the Senate Committees on Appropriations, Energy and Natural Resources, Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. She chairs the Committee on Indian Affairs. Nevertheless, her most important role (in my opinion) is that she is a major voice in the conscience of our country. She speaks her mind, and her words usually speak truth to power.

Earlier this month, she and the members of the Senate Appropriations Committee, wrote a strong letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio in which they denounced the freezing of USAID funds and the gutting of that agency that Rubio and Elon Musk had implemented. They accused Rubio and Musk of violating federal law. They demanded that Rubio go to Congress and defend his actions.

Over the last three weeks, Musk has continued his crusade to demolish federal agencies, alleging that he is eliminating “waste, corruption and fraud”. Instead of surgically cutting out just the waste, he has taken a chain saw approach that cuts out healthy programs (like Ebola prevention, protection of nuclear weapons, and actions to fight avian flu).

His actions reached a new extreme over the weekend when he launched a new policy requiring federal workers to write a weekly email report consisting of five bullet points that describe what they had accomplished in the previous week…or face dismissal. Murkowski immediately defended the federal workers and blasted Musk in a post on the X platform. She described Musk’s actions as “absurd”. She used his own language and told him to “get to know each department and agency” BEFORE he cuts federal jobs.

Murkowski then listed off the workers at the agencies that have seen cuts and defended their role in the federal government. “Our public servants work hard to ensure that our national security is protected; that planes land safely; that forest fires do not spread to our homes; that Social Security checks arrive on time; that research for the breakthroughs needed to cure diseases like cancer and ALS continues; and much more” She then concluded, “Our public workforce deserves to be treated with dignity and respect for the unheralded jobs they perform. The absurd weekend email to justify their existence wasn’t it.”

Murkowski’s courage might be contagious. Several of Trump’s appointed Cabinet members protested against Musk’s rash order. FBI Director Kash Patel instructed his employees to “pause” any response to Musk’s questionnaire. Other Cabinet members told their workers to “ignore” Musk’s order. Any sane observer acknowledges that Musk’s action has led to chaos in federal agencies. Up until now, Trump has backed Musk. How long will he tolerate this chaos in his own administration?

Lisa Murkowski: Because you spoke up, we the people appreciate you. Musk cancelled funding for Veteran Affairs. This affects services for veterans’ cancer care, toxin exposure assessment, and even burial services! We the people are raising our voices in protest. According to the most recent news, Musk’s VA reduction in VA funding has been reversed!

Lisa Murkowski: Thank you for your courage and conscience.

Elon Musk’s Freeze on USAID Funding: Either He is Stupid or He is Evil (Part 2)

A week ago, I wrote a post for my blog titled, “Elon Musk’s Freeze on USAID Funding: Either He is Stupid or He is Evil”. I was glad to see that the article raised a lot of discussion. I thought it would be worthwhile to update and develop my thoughts in this Part 2.

Update

In that first article, I listed several groups of people who would suffer great harm due to Elon Musk’s almost total freeze of USAID funding: disease, homelessness, hunger, and death. (None of my readers have challenged the accuracy of my statistics.) A federal judge ordered a pause on the freeze and that the funding be restored. The Trump administration then rescinded the Musk freeze, but the funding has not yet been substantially restored. In fact, a judge has ruled that the administration has “defied” the court order. Meanwhile, vulnerable people in our own country and around the world are continuing to suffer (through the lack of funds for Meals on Wheels, World Relief, etc.).

I argued that this suffering was unnecessary. The Musk staff (DOGE) could have audited the books of USAID and rooted out any waste or corruption BEFORE freezing the funding. This is what Musk should have done. He should have calculated the potential damage before he made his decision. If he didn’t do the proper calculation, he would have been careless or stupid. If he knowingly understood the probable consequences of his decision, and intentionally pursued it, his action would be evil. I use the word “evil” carefully. The Bible teaches that “the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil”. (I Timothy 6:10) I am defining evil deeds as those intentional actions that unnecessarily cause damage/harm to other people. Recent actions by Musk and his staff provide even more evidence that there is a “root of all kinds of evil” where the love of money trumps the love for people.

Haste Makes Waste

During the past two weeks, Musk has led a crusade to fire thousands of civil servants in various federal agencies (IRS, USDA, FAA, National Park Service, FTC, etc.). The alleged purpose was to rid the national government of wasteful spending and corruption, but specific accusations are lacking. Not only are the lives of these civil servants turned upside down, real damage is also being done to our country.

For example, last week Musk/DOGE fired 325 highly skilled workers of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) which is under the control of the Department of Energy. Musk and his staff apparently did not realize that these employees were the guardians of our country’s nuclear weapons. On Friday, Rob Plonski, a deputy division director of NNSA alerted our country to the gravity of the situation: “We cannot expect to project strength, deterrence, and world dominance while simultaneously stripping away the federal workforce that provides strategic oversight to ensure our nuclear enterprise remains safe, secure, and effective”. The damage has been done, but the negative impact will continue: “The consequences will be felt now and for years to come since these are highly qualified, largely STEM-trained personnel with a commitment to national security,” When Trump became aware of this awful mistake, he immediately rescinded Musk’s firing order. I used to believe Musk was quite savvy in business issues, but no more. His astute business reputation is being eroded day by day by his careless decisions to gut federal agencies.

The Strains of the Musk/Trump Relationship

Elon Musk’s approval rating (38%) is much lower than Donald Trump’s (46.6%), but Musk is getting more media attention than the president. Trump does not like this. Many of my readers have seen the clip in the White House where Musk is standing and speaking with his son perched on his shoulders. Meanwhile, Trump is sitting behind his desk and seems quite bored. Which one is the real president?

The White House is issuing enigmatic, mixed messages which attempt to bring Musk down a rung. “Musk is a senior advisor to the president,” Joshua Fisher, director of the White House Office of Administration, said in a declaration filed this week in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. “In his role as Senior Advisor to the President, Mr. Musk has no greater authority than other senior White House advisors. Like other senior White House advisors, Mr. Musk has no actual or formal authority to make government decisions himself. Mr. Musk can only advise the President and communicate the President’s directives.” So, is Musk the head of DOGE or is he not?

In addition, it is very evident that given his vast holdings of $400 billion, any major decision he makes is potentially a conflict of interests (TESLA, Starlink, and others). Nevertheless, he has not disinvested from these holdings nor has he stepped down from his companies, even though he is a “special governmental employee” of the current administration. The White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt stated, ““If Elon Musk comes across a conflict of interest with the contracts and the funding that DOGE is overseeing…Elon will excuse himself from those contracts.” This essentially affirms Musk would police himself. Polls show that the majority of Americans don’t believe in Musk’s honesty nor that he would recuse himself.

As Musk’s decisions continue to negatively impact people, his approval rating will continue to drop. I predict Trump will distant himself from Elon. It is doubtful that Musk will last the four years.