Tag: Buyer’s Remorse

Buyer’s Remorse Regarding Trump, Part 2: It is Harder to Govern than to Make Campaign Promises

Donald Trump 2.0 has finished one week into his second presidency. He signed a flurry of executive orders and made several presidential decisions. Many of these were popular with his base, but some were not. In my post last week, I suggested that his blanket pardon of the January 6 rioters (including those convicted of assault against police officers) was not popular with the U.S. public. Only 21% of North Americans approved of that decision. In fact, some of his supporters are showing signs of buyer’s remorse. What about his other decisions? Will they increase his support or lead to greater dissatisfaction. Let’s explore some of them.

The War in Gaza

I begin with giving credit where credit is due. Even before his second inauguration had occurred, Trump’s team worked together with Biden’s people to pressure Netanyahu to agree to the tenuous ceasefire and prisoner/hostage release with Hamas. The ceasefire has held so far. Why did Trump support the Biden plan?  Trump had bragged that he was Negotiator-in-Chief and could end any war. Kudos to Trump, but the road ahead will not be easy. Will he be able to help negotiate a long-lasting peace that is fair for both the Israelis and the Palestinian people? Or will his administration get bogged down by a never-ending conflict in the Middle East? His suggestion that two million Palestinians leave Gaza does not sound fair nor just.

Russia’s War Against Ukraine

Candidate Trump had promised that he would end the war in Ukraine by his first day in office. Of course, this did not happen. Those that voted for him should either feel some buyer’s remorse or that they were utterly naïve to believe his false promises.

FEMA, North Carolina and California

To his credit, Trump visited the hard-hit areas of North Carolina (hurricanes last fall) and Los Angeles (wildfires during January). Nevertheless, he made comments that raised significant concerns. He suggested that in the future, emergency aid would become a responsibility of the states and not of the national government through its Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).. The possible elimination of FEMA did not sit well with most Americans who have come to believe that emergency relief is primarily a duty of the federal government. For each state to maintain a large, stand-by emergency workforce would be inefficient and extremely costly.

Immigration/Birthright Citizenship

Trump made many decisions regarding immigration. He ordered that babies born in the U.S. to undocumented immigrants would not have an automatic right to citizenship. This is a clear violation of the 14th Amendment to our Constitution which does grant that right to everyone born in our country. The president’s order was immediately blocked by Federal Judge John Coughenour (who had been appointed by former president Reagan) who declared Trump’s action to be “blatantly unconstitutional”. Trump also affirmed that “we are the only country in the world that grants birthright citizenship”. This is a LIE! Dozens of countries permit birthright citizenship. I know because our three children were born in Mexico and have Mexican citizenship (even though neither my wife nor I are Mexicans).

Immigration/Scapegoating

We have a long sad history of scapegoating foreign immigrants, falsely blaming them for many evils they did not commit and not acknowledging how they toiled under difficult conditions to build our country. We did this to the Irish, the Italians, the Jews, the Chinese, the Mexicans, and many more. We continue to do this today with undocumented immigrants. They work night and day on our farms, in our hotels and factories, or in construction. They pay sales tax, income tax, Social Security tax, real estate tax, and other taxes, yet we accuse them for the failures of our economy. They are blamed for the crime in our streets, even though police records consistently show their crime rate is much lower than those born in the United States.  President Trump has said he will deport nine million undocumented immigrants. This would lead to skyrocketing inflation, especially for groceries. As more and more citizens realize that scapegoating is ethically cruel and economically inaccurate, buyer’s remorse will rise.

Tariffs

Nations place tariffs upon certain products from other countries, usually to punish another country or to protect a national industry. The use of tariffs almost never works and almost always raises prices for consumers. It is the opposite of free market capitalism. Trump has promised to levy 25% tariffs on products from Mexico and Canada and 50% on some from China. The overwhelming majority of economists disagree with the president. They affirm this would greatly increase inflation. On Sunday, Trump and Colombia’s President Gustavo Preto had a conflict on Sunday as Petro refused to receive Colombian immigrants who were being deported. Both presidents slapped a 25% tariff on the other country. It appears that last night the disagreement had been resolved. If the tariffs were to take effect, coffee prices in the U.S. would skyrocket.

Trump campaigned on lowering prices on groceries, rent, and gasoline. He has more recently tried to walk this back and has acknowledged, “It is really hard to lower prices”. He is now making a more modest promise of “lowering the rate of inflation”. The following political affirmation is quite true regarding the criteria used to evaluate a president: “It’s the economy, stupid”. If Trump lowers inflation, most citizens will give him a good grade, but if inflation rises, so will buyer’s remorse.

In my next post, I will analyze the morality/immorality of Trump’s executive orders.

Buyer’s Remorse regarding Trump: Even the Fraternal Order of Police Criticizes his Pardon of Insurrectionists

Buyer’s Remorse! This occurs when a person buys something (a car, a home, etc.) and then finds out that what was bought was defective and that the seller misrepresented the product. The person then regrets the purchase and feels anger with the seller for having lied. Last November, U.S. citizens bought a product when a plurality (not a majority) of voters (49.5%) elected Trump as president. In this first week of his presidency, he has issued a flurry of controversial executive orders and has made other decisions regarding immigrants, refugees, tariffs, the Paris Accords on Climate Change, the World Health Organization, and on and on. The action that has produced the most criticism, even by those who had supported Trump, was his pardon of the January 6, 2021 insurrectionists. The reaction has been swift and is the beginning of buyer’s remorse regarding Trump.

On Tuesday, President Trump pardoned or commuted the sentence of all 1500 people who had been convicted of crimes in the insurrection that took place at the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Some pardons had been expected. Presidents have the right to selectively pardon people on an individual basis, but pardoning all the criminals went too far. This blanket pardon was an attack on the rule of law. For example, earlier this month in an interview with Fox News, Vice President Vance had stated, “If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned”. Vance was right. Nevertheless, six hundred of those who were pardoned had been found guilty of assaulting police officers. Over 140 police had suffered injuries during the riot. These were not “minor incidents” as the president now claims.

Police organizations across the country have rallied to support their colleagues. The Fraternal Order of Police is the largest police union in the United States. They endorsed Trump in the presidential elections of 2016, 2020, and 2024. In a joint declaration together with the International Association of Chiefs of Police, they strongly criticized this blanket pardon. “Crimes against law enforcement are not just attacks on individuals or public safety. They are attacks on society and undermine the rule of law. Allowing those convicted of these crimes to be released early diminishes accountability and devalues the sacrifices made by courageous law enforcement officers and their families. When perpetrators of crimes, especially serious crimes, are not held fully accountable, it sends a dangerous message that the consequences for attacking law enforcement are not severe, potentially emboldening others to commit similar acts of violence.”

Elected Republican senators and congressional representatives have been asked for their opinions regarding the blanket pardon. Senator Lisa Murkowski had the courage to denounce the pardon, but most Republican officials claim that haven’t seen the videos of the insurrection. This is a lame alibi, because most of these officials were in the Capitol on that tragic day, and videos of the riot have been widely available for four years. Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, said it wasn’t his “place” to comment on the pardon. What a coward! The House of Representatives was precisely the “place” where the insurrection happened.

This pardon cannot now be undone, but Trump could at least issue an apology. If he doesn’t demonstrate remorse, others will.